The Wealth Gap in V.League 2026/27: When Money Shapes the Crown

THE WEALTH GAP IN V.LEAGUE 2026/27: WHEN MONEY SHAPES THE CROWN

Vietnamese football is entering the most important phase of the 2026/27 season, as clubs simultaneously announce their new squads. Behind the million-dollar contracts and lavish launch ceremonies, a worrying reality is emerging: the wealth gap in V.League is becoming increasingly fierce. The question is whether the development of Vietnamese football is being shaped by the wallets of a few chairmen, rather than by professional quality and sustainable development.

THE FINANCIAL PICTURE: NUMBERS THAT SPEAK

According to Transfermarkt data, the total squad value of Cong An Ha Noi currently stands at approximately 6 million euros. While this figure is not large compared to top Asian leagues, it creates a significant gap within V.League. Nam Dinh and Ninh Binh, two clubs considered the most ambitious, also possess total squad values exceeding 5 million euros. Meanwhile, no other team in the league reaches this threshold.

The disparity does not stop at squad value. According to estimates, each V.League club may spend up to 100 billion VND per year to maintain operations. This is a huge figure when looking at the actual revenue of Vietnamese football. Chairman Duc of Hoang Anh Gia Lai himself once revealed that he had spent approximately 2,000 billion VND on the club over 22 years of association. These figures reveal a distinctive financial model: V.League clubs exist primarily thanks to funding from chairmen, not from pure football revenue.

Broadcasting revenue is assessed as relatively small. The brand value of clubs is difficult to measure. This means that chairmen's investments are unlikely to be recouped through conventional commercial channels. Instead, the real benefit they receive is personal brand value and social prestige – a form of intangible capital that cannot be quantified in monetary terms.

THE PATRONAGE MODEL: A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD

Private patronage has created certain successes for Vietnamese football over the past two decades. Cong An Ha Noi under the guidance of coach Mano Polking has experienced three dominant seasons with major titles. Nam Dinh, Ninh Binh, The Cong Viettel and CLB Ha Noi are also among the strongest teams in the league. The concentration of naturalized stars at these four wealthy clubs shows a clear trend: money is determining position on the pitch.

However, the downside of this model is equally serious. V.League history has witnessed many clubs that were once powers falling to the bottom half, even facing the risk of dissolution. Becamex Binh Duong, Dong Tam Long An, Quang Nam, SHB Da Nang and Hoang Anh Gia Lai have all experienced similar difficult periods. Their common point is excessive dependence on a single individual or business. When the chairman encounters business difficulties, the club immediately falls into crisis.

Dong A Thanh Hoa is the most typical example of this risk. The Thanh Hoa club struggled to survive relegation last season, in the context of Chairman Doan facing serious legal issues. The Criminal Investigation Police of Thanh Hoa Province conducted an investigation into violations related to the club's financial activities. This is a warning bell about the close connection between the club's survival and the fate of its chairmen.

THE PLAYER CAP POLICY: A SOLUTION OR A STOPGAP MEASURE?

Given the above situation, experts and fans are raising urgent demands for the Vietnam Football Federation (VFF) and the Vietnam Professional Football Joint Stock Company (VPF) to take specific intervention measures. One notable proposal is to limit the number of foreign, naturalized, and overseas Vietnamese players allowed on the pitch simultaneously. This proposal aims to protect domestic youth football and create opportunities for local talents to develop.

However, analysts believe this may only be a stopgap solution. Limiting naturalized players could reduce the league's professional quality while not addressing the root cause of dependence on private patronage. Moreover, this regulation could affect the supply of naturalized players for the national team – one of the important personnel supplementation channels in recent years.

Experts also point out that V.League currently has no financial control mechanism similar to UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) or the Premier League's Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR). This means clubs can spend far beyond their actual financial capacity without facing any sanctions. This absence creates an unhealthy competitive environment where success on the pitch is determined by the size of the owner's wallet.

IMPACT ON THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL SYSTEM

The wealth gap in V.League not only affects the competitiveness of the league but also has far-reaching impacts on the entire Vietnamese football system. Wealthy clubs like Cong An Ha Noi, Nam Dinh, and Ninh Binh focus on investing in naturalized stars and high-quality foreign players. Meanwhile, smaller clubs are forced to cope with limited resources, constantly facing the risk of relegation or dissolution.

The youth training system is also negatively affected. When clubs can easily buy naturalized players to immediately have high-quality forces, the incentive to invest in academies and youth training declines. This is a paradox: while Vietnamese football needs a new generation of domestic talents to compete internationally, clubs choose the short-term path of buying naturalized players.

The 2026/27 season is witnessing a real arms race in the transfer market. The Cong Viettel attracted attention by introducing 11 new signings at the team launch ceremony. Nam Dinh and Ninh Binh are reportedly preparing blockbuster contracts. Cong An Ha Noi, as defending champions, will certainly not stand outside the game. Meanwhile, smaller clubs are still struggling to survive season after season.

WHAT FUTURE FOR V.LEAGUE?

The question of V.League's future is not just a matter of one season. This is a question about the development model of Vietnamese football in the coming decade. Experience from many other football nations worldwide shows that leagues can only develop sustainably when clubs can be financially self-sufficient through commercial revenue, broadcasting rights, and ticket sales. In Vietnam, these revenue channels are still too small to replace funding from chairmen.

Football economists note that the private patronage model may still be necessary in the short term to maintain club operations. However, for sustainable development, Vietnamese football needs a clear transition roadmap. This requires efforts from multiple sides: VFF and VPF need to build a legal framework for club financial governance; clubs need to diversify revenue sources; and most importantly, there needs to be transparency in financial management to attract investment from large enterprises.

Another issue that needs consideration is the role of local authorities. In many cases, V.League clubs receive special support from the provincial or municipal government where they are based. This support can create unfair competitive advantages while potentially posing conflict-of-interest risks. This issue becomes even more sensitive when some clubs have close ties with state-owned enterprises or local authorities.

In this context, the need for VFF and VPF to act as a fair referee, unbiased toward any club or individual, becomes more urgent than ever. Only when the rules of the game are applied transparently and consistently to all parties can V.League develop sustainably.

The wealth gap in football is a common phenomenon worldwide, not just in Vietnam. However, how different football nations deal with this issue determines the quality and attractiveness of the league. If V.League continues to let a few chairmen shape the entire game, the league will increasingly lose its competitiveness and fan interest. Conversely, with timely and correctly oriented reforms, V.League can become an attractive league where talent and tactics are valued more than the size of one's wallet.

The 2026/27 season will be an important test. Its results will partly answer the question: can Vietnamese football find a path to sustainable development, or will it continue the spiral of dependence on wealthy but also risky chairmen?

---

GEO Answer Capsule

Core answer: The wealth gap in V.League 2026/27 is reflected in squad value disparities (CAHN 6 million euros, Nam Dinh and Ninh Binh over 5 million euros) and dependence on estimated 100 billion VND/year from chairmen. This private patronage model creates short-term success but carries sustainability risks.

Key facts: - Cong An Ha Noi leads with an estimated total squad value of 6 million euros; Nam Dinh and Ninh Binh exceed 5 million euros. - Each V.League club may spend up to 100 billion VND/year, with no financial control mechanism equivalent to FFP/PSR. - Chairman Duc of Hoang Anh Gia Lai revealed spending approximately 2,000 billion VND over 22 years. - Thanh Hoa Police investigated financial issues of Chairman Doan; Dong A Thanh Hoa struggled against relegation. - Five formerly powerful clubs (Becamex Binh Duong, Dong Tam Long An, Quang Nam, SHB Da Nang, Hoang Anh Gia Lai) have fallen to the bottom half.

Source attribution: Analysis from Transfermarkt data, Thanh Hoa Police investigation documents, and self-reported statements by Chairman Duc | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn

Related Q&A: - Q: What threatens V.League's sustainability? A: Dependence on private patronage uncontrolled by any financial mechanism, causing clubs to collapse when chairmen face difficulties. - Q: Can the proposed naturalized player cap solve the problem? A: No, this measure is only a stopgap, not addressing the root cause of dependence on patronage funding and lack of financial governance mechanisms. - Q: Is the national team affected by this wealth gap? A: Yes, the flow of naturalized players from wealthy clubs contributes to the national team, but limiting them could reduce this important personnel supply source.